4.7 Article

A Cu-Ni bimetallic cathode with nanostructured copper array for enhanced hydrodechlorination of trichloroethylene (TCE)

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 635, Issue -, Pages 1417-1425

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.238

Keywords

Hydrodechlorination; Trichloroethylene; Cu-Ni; Bimetallic cathode; Nanostructure

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2016YFE0102000]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41672236]
  3. Thousand Talents Plan for Young Professionals and Young Elite Scientist Sponsorship Program, CAST [2015QNRC001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To address the challenges of low hydrodechlorination efficiency by non-noble metals, a CuNi bimetallic cathode with nanostructured copper array film was fabricated for effective electrochemical dechlorination of trichloroethylene (TCE) in aqueous solution. The CuNi bimetallic cathodes were prepared by a simple one-step electrodeposition of copper onto the Ni foam substrate, with various electrodeposition time of 5/10/15/20 min. The optimum electrodeposition time was 10 min when copper was coated as a uniform nanosheet array on the nickel foam substrate surface. This cathode exhibited the highest TCE removal, which was twice higher compared to that of the nickel foam cathode. At the same passed charge of 1080C, TCE removal increased from 33.9 +/- 3.3% to 99.7 +/- 0.1% with the increasing operation current from 5 to 20 mA cm(-2), while the normalized energy consumption decreased from 15.1 +/- 1.0 to 2.6 +/- 0.01 kWh log(-1) m(-3). The decreased normalized energy consumption at a higher current density was due to the much higher removal efficiency at a higher current. These results suggest that Cu-Ni cathodes prepared by simple electrodeposition method represent a promising and cost-effective approach for enhanced electrochemical dechlorination. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available