4.7 Article

Leaching of vanadium from waste V2O5-WO3/TiO2 catalyst catalyzed by functional microorganisms

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 639, Issue -, Pages 497-503

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.168

Keywords

Solid wastes; Selective catalytic reduction catalyst; V2O5-WO3/TiO2; Bioleaching; Acidithiobacillus

Funding

  1. NSFC [21777155, 41471260]
  2. Xiamen Municipal Science and Technology Program [3502Z20172027]
  3. Fujian Provincial Department of ST Project [2016T3032]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Solid wastes are currently produced in large amounts. Although bioleaching of metals from solid wastes is an economical and sustainable technology, it has seldom been used to recycle metals from abandoned catalyst. In this study, the bioleaching of vanadium from V2O5-WO3/TiO2 catalyst were comprehensively investigated through five methods: Oligotrophic way, Eutrophic way, S-mediated way, Fe-mediated way and Mixed way of S-mediated and Fe-mediated. The observed vanadium bioleaching effectiveness of the assayed methods was follows: S-mediated > Mixed > Oligotrophic > Eutrophic > Fe-mediated, which yielded the maximum bioleaching efficiencies of approximately 90%, 35%, 33%, 20% and 7%, respectively. The microbial community analysis suggested that the predominant genera Acidithiobacillus and Sulfobacillus from the S-mediated bioleaching way effectively catalyzed the vanadium leaching, which could have occurred through the indirect mechanism from the microbial oxidation of S-0. In addition, the direct mechanism, involving direct electron transfer between the catalyst and the microorganisms that attached to the catalyst surface, should also help the vanadium to be leached more effectively. Therefore, this work provides guidance for future research and practical application on the treatment of waste V2O5-WO3/TiO2 catalyst. (c) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available