4.7 Article

Quantitative models for predicting adsorption of oxytetracycline, ciprofloxacin and sulfamerazine to swine manures with contrasting properties

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 634, Issue -, Pages 1148-1156

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.114

Keywords

Oxytetracycline; Ciprofloxacin; Sulfamerazine; Swine manure; Distribution coefficient

Funding

  1. National Key Technology R & D Program of China [2016YFD0800603]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31572209, 31772395]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2016M600151]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Understanding antibiotic adsorption in livestock manures is crucial to assess the fate and risk of antibiotics in the environment. In this study, three quantitativemodels developed with swinemanure-water distribution coefficients (LgK(d)) for oxytetracycline (OTC), ciprofloxacin (CIP) and sulfamerazine (SM1) in swine manures. Physicochemical parameters (n = 12) of the swine manure were used as independent variables using partial least-squares (PLSs) analysis. The cumulative cross-validated regression coefficients (Q(cum)(2)) values, standard deviations (SDs) and external validation coefficient (Q(ext)(2)) ranged from0.761 to 0.868, 0.027 to 0.064, and 0.743 to 0.827 for the threemodels; as such, internal and external predictability of the models were strong. The pH, soluble organic carbon (SOC) and nitrogen (SON), and Ca were important explanatory variables for the OTC-Model, pH, SOC, and SON for the CIPmodel, and pH, total organic nitrogen (TON), and SOC for the SM1-model. The high VIPs (variable importance in the projections) of pH (1.178-1.396), SOC (0.968-1.034), and SON (0.822 and 0.865) established these physicochemical parameters as likely being dominant (associatively) in affecting transport of antibiotics in swine manures. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available