Differences in diagnostic activity in general practice and findings for individuals invited to the danish screening programme for colorectal cancer: a population-based cohort study
Published 2018 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Differences in diagnostic activity in general practice and findings for individuals invited to the danish screening programme for colorectal cancer: a population-based cohort study
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Volume -, Issue -, Pages 1-10
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Online
2018-06-22
DOI
10.1080/02813432.2018.1487378
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Validity of data in the Danish Colorectal Cancer Screening Database
- (2017) Mette Kielsholm Thomsen et al. Clinical Epidemiology
- Diagnosing colorectal cancer and inflammatory bowel disease in primary care: The usefulness of tests for faecal haemoglobin, faecal calprotectin, anaemia and iron deficiency. A prospective study
- (2016) Cecilia Högberg et al. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
- Colorectal cancer screening participation: a systematic review
- (2015) A. Wools et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
- Faecal haemoglobin and faecal calprotectin as indicators of bowel disease in patients presenting to primary care with bowel symptoms
- (2015) Craig Mowat et al. GUT
- Increased diagnostic activity in general practice during the year preceding colorectal cancer diagnosis
- (2015) Pernille Libach Hansen et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
- Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: Sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012
- (2014) Jacques Ferlay et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
- Stage at diagnosis and colorectal cancer survival in six high-income countries: A population-based study of patients diagnosed during 2000–2007
- (2013) Camille Maringe et al. ACTA ONCOLOGICA
- Two-week wait symptoms are prevalent in screened patients with a positive faecal occult blood test but do not predict cancer
- (2013) P. G. Vaughan-Shaw et al. Colorectal Disease
- Predictors of dropout in the German disease management program for type 2 diabetes
- (2012) Birgit Fullerton et al. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Point-of-Care Fecal Calprotectin and Immunochemical Occult Blood Tests for Diagnosis of Organic Bowel Disease in Primary Care: The Cost-Effectiveness of a Decision Rule for Abdominal Complaints in Primary Care (CEDAR) Study
- (2012) L. Kok et al. CLINICAL CHEMISTRY
- Lower gastrointestinal symptoms are prevalent among individuals colonoscoped within the Bowel Cancer Screening Programme
- (2012) P. T. Rajasekhar et al. Colorectal Disease
- Low faecal haemoglobin concentration potentially rules out significant colorectal disease
- (2012) P. J. McDonald et al. Colorectal Disease
- General Practice and Primary Health Care in Denmark
- (2012) K. M. Pedersen et al. Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
- The Danish National Health Service Register
- (2011) John Sahl Andersen et al. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
- The Danish National Prescription Registry
- (2011) Helle Wallach Kildemoes et al. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
- The Danish Cancer Registry
- (2011) Marianne Lundkjær Gjerstorff SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
- The Danish National Patient Register
- (2011) Elsebeth Lynge et al. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
- The Danish Civil Registration System
- (2011) Carsten Bøcker Pedersen SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
- Socioeconomic position and participation in colorectal cancer screening
- (2010) B L Frederiksen et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
- Five misconceptions in cancer diagnosis
- (2009) William Hamilton BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE
- Social inequality and incidence of and survival from cancers of the colon and rectum in a population-based study in Denmark, 1994–2003
- (2008) Rikke Egeberg et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started