The Effect of Geographic Proximity to Unconventional Oil and Gas Development on Public Support for Hydraulic Fracturing
Published 2018 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
The Effect of Geographic Proximity to Unconventional Oil and Gas Development on Public Support for Hydraulic Fracturing
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
RISK ANALYSIS
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -
Publisher
Wiley
Online
2018-04-11
DOI
10.1111/risa.12989
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- How do U.S. state residents form opinions about ‘fracking’ in social contexts? A multilevel analysis
- (2017) Emily L. Howell et al. ENERGY POLICY
- Not in My Backyard: CCS Sites and Public Perception of CCS
- (2017) Carola Braun RISK ANALYSIS
- Deliberating the perceived risks, benefits, and societal implications of shale gas and oil extraction by hydraulic fracturing in the US and UK
- (2017) Merryn Thomas et al. Nature Energy
- How geographic distance and political ideology interact to influence public perception of unconventional oil/natural gas development
- (2016) Christopher E. Clarke et al. ENERGY POLICY
- The bundle below: Understanding unconventional oil and gas development through analysis of lease agreements
- (2016) Dylan Bugden et al. ENERGY POLICY
- The Distribution of Climate Change Public Opinion in Canada
- (2016) Matto Mildenberger et al. PLoS One
- Politics, proximity and the pipeline: Mapping public attitudes toward Keystone XL
- (2015) Timothy B. Gravelle et al. ENERGY POLICY
- Public opinion on energy development: The interplay of issue framing, top-of-mind associations, and political ideology
- (2015) Christopher E. Clarke et al. ENERGY POLICY
- Unconventional Gas Development in the USA: Exploring the Risk Perception Issues
- (2015) John D. Graham et al. RISK ANALYSIS
- Geographic variation in opinions on climate change at state and local scales in the USA
- (2015) Peter D. Howe et al. Nature Climate Change
- The Environmental Costs and Benefits of Fracking
- (2014) Robert B. Jackson et al. Annual Review of Environment and Resources
- Mapping the shadow of experience of extreme weather events
- (2014) Peter D. Howe et al. CLIMATIC CHANGE
- Review of Risks to Communities from Shale Energy Development
- (2014) Jeffrey B. Jacquet ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
- Cornucopia or curse? Reviewing the costs and benefits of shale gas hydraulic fracturing (fracking)
- (2014) Benjamin K. Sovacool RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS
- Methane Leaks from North American Natural Gas Systems
- (2014) A. R. Brandt et al. SCIENCE
- Sharp increase in central Oklahoma seismicity since 2008 induced by massive wastewater injection
- (2014) K. M. Keranen et al. SCIENCE
- Differing opinions about natural gas drilling in two adjacent counties with different levels of drilling activity
- (2013) J. Kriesky et al. ENERGY POLICY
- “Fracking” controversy and communication: Using national survey data to understand public perceptions of hydraulic fracturing
- (2013) Hilary Boudet et al. ENERGY POLICY
- Increased stray gas abundance in a subset of drinking water wells near Marcellus shale gas extraction
- (2013) R. B. Jackson et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Landowner attitudes toward natural gas and wind farm development in northern Pennsylvania
- (2012) Jeffrey B. Jacquet ENERGY POLICY
- Public attitudes of wind energy in Texas: Local communities in close proximity to wind farms and their effect on decision-making
- (2010) Jeffrey Swofford et al. ENERGY POLICY
- Construal-level theory of psychological distance.
- (2010) Yaacov Trope et al. PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW
- NIMBY, CLAMP, and the Location of New Nuclear-Related Facilities: U.S. National and 11 Site-Specific Surveys
- (2009) Michael R. Greenberg RISK ANALYSIS
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started