4.7 Article

Which countries are more ecologically efficient in improving human well-being? An application of the Index of Ecological Well-being Performance

Journal

RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING
Volume 129, Issue -, Pages 112-119

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.10.015

Keywords

Index of Ecological Well-being Performance; Human well-being; Ecological consumption; Human Development Index; Ecological Footprint

Funding

  1. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2016M601567]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71673200, 71473165, 71373179, 71273171, 71173156]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In today's world, improving the efficiency of transforming ecological consumption into human well-being is a necessary condition for humanity as a whole to achieve higher levels of well-being within ecological limits. In this paper, the Index of Ecological Well-being Performance (IEWP) is defined and constructed to measure the efficiency of transforming ecological consumption into human well-being and to determine which countries are more ecologically efficient in improving human well-being. As an efficiency measure, the main mission of the IEWP is to urge and stimulate countries to improve human well-being in an ecologically efficient way. The Human Development Index (measuring human well-being) and the Ecological Footprint (measuring ecological consumption) are employed to construct the IEWP. An empirical IEWP analysis of 82 countries with a population larger than 10 million in 2012 demonstrates that the developed countries (except Romania) and the G20 countries (except India and Indonesia) are generally less ecologically efficient in improving human well-being. To make national well-being improvement not only ecologically efficient but also equitable, several suggestions are proposed regarding respective responsibilities for global ecological sustainability in the process of improving IEWP performance for countries with different ecological conditions and development stages.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available