4.7 Article

Site selection for offshore wind farms in the southwest coast of South Korea

Journal

RENEWABLE ENERGY
Volume 120, Issue -, Pages 151-162

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2017.12.081

Keywords

Offshore wind farm; Site selection; Decision-making support tool; InVEST

Funding

  1. Disaster and Safety Management Institute - Ministry of Public Safety and Security of Korean government [MPSS-MC-2016-05]
  2. Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning(KETEP)
  3. Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy(MOTIE) of Korean government [20163010024660]
  4. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [20163010024660] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study is to provide guidance for selecting sites suitable for offshore wind farm developments with lower social, economic, and environmental impacts in the South Korea southwest coastal area with its complicated shoreline configuration, large ecologically important tidal flats, and various marine-based human activities. To analyze the economic feasibility of offshore wind farms, harvestable energy was calculated using an InVEST (Integrated Valuation of Environmental Services and Tradeoffs) model that has been used widely for marine ecosystem service analysis. Capital costs for grid connection and electricity transmission, operation and maintenance costs, and other costs were integrated together to calculate a net present value (NPV) of a 60-MW offshore wind farm assuming a lifetime of 20 years of operation. It is important to note that NPVs of offshore wind farms are affected significantly by the proximity to the closest inland substations, showing the importance of grid connection. Criteria that may cause social and environmental conflicts were grouped into three categories: nature conservation and landscape protection, marine-based human activities, and marine environment and marine ecosystem. Available datasets for each category were compiled and incorporated into GIS-based maps. Many social and environmental criteria overlapped spatially, and areas influenced by one or more criteria were designated as areas of potential conflicts. Economic analysis results and potential social and environmental conflicts were considered together to select areas that could produce wind energy more efficiently with minimum social and environmental conflicts. Economic, social, and environmental assessment strategies and, procedures provided in this study can be used as an effective decision-making support tool to find sites for offshore wind farm development and various other offshore developments as well. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available