4.5 Article

Risk of overhydration and low lean tissue index as measured using a body composition monitor in patients on hemodialysis: a systemic review and meta-analysis

Journal

RENAL FAILURE
Volume 40, Issue 1, Pages 51-59

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/0886022X.2017.1419963

Keywords

Overhydration; lean tissue index; body composition monitor; hemodialysis; end stage renal disease

Funding

  1. Inha University Hospital

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Overhydration and sarcopenia, related to an individual's nutritional status, have been associated with increased cardiovascular mortality and poor prognosis in patients on hemodialysis. The purpose of this study was to investigate the prediction of overhydration and sarcopenia on mortality in patients on hemodialysis using a body composition monitor. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis using a random-effects model. We searched the Cochrane Central Register, OVID MEDLINE, EMBASE and PubMed databases for all studies published prior to December 9, 2016 and reviewed the reference lists of relevant reviews, registered trials and relevant conference proceedings. The overhydration group (fluid excess, >15% vs. the normohydration group) and the low lean tissue index group (<10%) were compared with a reference group. Six trials, consisting of 29,469 patients, were included in the pooled analysis. The pooled hazard ratio for overall survival of the overhydration group, compared with the reference normohydration group was 1.798 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.53-2.804, p=.001). The hazard ratio for mortality in the low lean tissue index group was 1.533 (95% CI, 1.411-1.644; p=.001) in the random-effects model. The results from the most recent study showed the greatest heterogeneity in the sensitivity analysis. Low lean tissue index and overhydration, measured using a body composition monitor, were associated with a high mortality rate in patients on hemodialysis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available