4.4 Article

A comparison of fish pesticide metabolic pathways with those of the rat and goat

Journal

REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 94, Issue -, Pages 124-143

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2018.01.019

Keywords

Metabolism; Biotransformation; Metabolic map; Rainbow trout; Bluegill sunfish; Rat; Goat; MetaPath; Risk assessment; Species extrapolation

Funding

  1. US Environmental Protection Agency

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ecological risk assessments are often limited in their ability to consider metabolic transformations for fish species due to a lack of data. When these types of evaluations are attempted they are often based on parent chemical only, or by assuming similarity to available mammalian metabolic pathways. The metabolism maps for five pesticides (fluazinam, halauxifen-methyl, kresoxim-methyl, mandestrobin, and tolclofos-methyl) were compared across three species. A rapid and transparent process, utilizing a database of systematically collected information for rat, goat, and fish (bluegill or rainbow trout), and using data evaluation tools in the previously described metabolism pathway software system MetaPath, is presented. The approach demonstrates how comparisons of metabolic maps across species are aided by considering the sample matrix in which metabolites were quantified for each species, differences in analytical methods used to identify metabolites in each study, and the relative amounts of metabolites quantified. By incorporating these considerations, more extensive rat and goat metabolism maps were found to be useful predictors of the more limited metabolism of the five pesticides in fish.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
Article Medicine, Legal

New supporting data to guide the use of evident toxicity in acute oral toxicity studies (OECD TG 420)

Fiona Sewell, Ian Ragan, Graham Horgan, David Andrew, Thomas Holmes, Irene Manou, Boris P. Mueller, Tim Rowan, Barbara G. Schmitt, Marco Corvaro

Summary: There are currently three test guidelines for acute oral toxicity studies, but the subjectivity of one guideline may be hindering its wider use. In order to address this, the NC3Rs and EPAA collaborated to analyze historical data and provide recommendations on the recognition of 'evident toxicity'.

REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY (2024)

Article Medicine, Legal

The 2022 world health organization reevaluation of human and mammalian toxic equivalency factors for polychlorinated dioxins, dibenzofurans and biphenyls

Michael DeVito, Bas Bokkers, Majorie B. M. van Duursen, Karin van Ede, Mark Feeley, Elsa Antunes Fernandes Gaspar, Laurie Haws, Sean Kennedy, Richard E. Peterson, Ron Hoogenboom, Keiko Nohara, Kim Petersen, Cynthia Rider, Martin Rose, Stephen Safe, Dieter Schrenk, Matthew W. Wheeler, Daniele S. Wikoff, Bin Zhao, Martin van den Berg

Summary: In October 2022, the World Health Organization reevaluated the toxic equivalency factors (TEFs) for chlorinated dioxin-like compounds in a panel convened in Lisbon. This effort utilized an updated database, Bayesian dose response modeling, and meta-analysis to derive Best-Estimate TEFs. Applying these new TEFs may result in lower total toxic equivalents for dioxin-like chemicals.

REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY (2024)