4.7 Article

How and when does mental illness stigma impact treatment seeking? Longitudinal examination of relationships between anticipated and internalized stigma, symptom severity, and mental health service use

Journal

PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH
Volume 268, Issue -, Pages 15-20

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.06.036

Keywords

Depression; Stigma; Treatment seeking; Mental illness; Veterans

Categories

Funding

  1. Department of Veterans Affairs, Health Services Research and Development Service [DHI 09-086, IIR 12-345]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although mental illness stigma has been identified as an important barrier to mental health treatment, there is little consensus regarding how and when mental illness stigma negatively impacts treatment seeking. The relationship between mental illness stigma and treatment seeking may depend on the particular stigma mechanism under investigation, as well as an individual's symptom severity. In the present study, we examined relationships between anticipated and internalized stigma, depressive symptom severity, and mental health service use using data from a two-wave longitudinal survey study of U.S. post-9/11 veterans. Mediated and moderated relationships were tested using PROCESS. Mediation analyses revealed that higher anticipated stigma led to higher levels of internalized stigma, which was associated with decreased treatment seeking. Moderation analyses revealed that anticipated stigma was only associated with treatment seeking when depressive symptoms were severe. The central role observed for internalized stigma highlights the value of stigma reduction efforts that focus on this stigma mechanism, whereas the finding that only those individuals with more severe symptoms are vulnerable to the negative effects of anticipated stigma underscores the importance of more targeted anti-stigma interventions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available