4.7 Article

Response surface methodological analysis for the optimization of acid-catalyzed transesterification biodiesel wastewater pre-treatment using coagulation-flocculation process

Journal

PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
Volume 113, Issue -, Pages 184-192

Publisher

INST CHEMICAL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1016/j.psep.2017.10.006

Keywords

Biodiesel; Optimization; Alum coagulant; Jar test; Response Surface Methodology (RSM) method; Box-Behnken design

Funding

  1. Department of Chemical and Process Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan, Malaysia [INDUSTRI-2012-029]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Biodiesel wastewater is known as one of the most highly polluted wastewaters with high organic load, high amount of oils and fat contents and other compound such as chloride. The aim of this study is to optimize the coagulation-flocculation process prior to pre-treat biodiesel wastewater. This paper reports the optimal process conditions which were obtained using the Response Surface Methodology (RSM) analysis. This study was done using jar test apparatus. The Box-Behnken design was demonstrated beforehand to optimize this process. The investigated operating variables were coagulant dosage, initial pH, rapid mixing rate and contact time. The optimal process conditions obtained were alum dosage of 2 g/L, initial pH of 7.13, rapid mixing rate of 200 rpm and settling time of 65 min. From the validation test conducted, the results were in reasonable agreement with the modeled values. The coagulant used in this study managed to reduce the COD, SS and turbidity contents by 34.5, 39.0 and 32.0%. respectively. Optimization of coagulation-flocculation can be done using the Response Surface Methodology (RSM) analysis and this proving that coagulation is capable of pre-treating biodiesel wastewater. (C) 2017 Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available