4.6 Review

Response and tolerance of yeast to changing environmental stress during ethanol fermentation

Journal

PROCESS BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 72, Issue -, Pages 1-12

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.procbio.2018.07.001

Keywords

Fermentation; Thermal stress; Osmotic stress; Trehalose; Ethanol

Funding

  1. ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal
  2. National Fund for Basic, Strategic and Frontier Application Research in Agriculture (NFBSFARA), ICAR, India

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In development of yeast cell factories, the adequate stress tolerance of the yeast strains is the universal requirement for industrial fermentation. Primary stress factor is the end product toxicity which has to be accumulated to obtain economically feasible performance in industrial processes. Second stress factor is the concentration and composition of substrate used for ethanol production and the third stress factor is temperature gradients in the fermentor which influence fermentation rate and productivity. This review encloses the development in understanding the response of yeast towards various environmental stresses: heat shock, ethanol stress and osmotic stress. These stresses are fundamental challenges that are experienced by various microbes. Physiological changes such as the synthesis of compatible solutes and heat shock proteins also contribute to cellular survival. Different methods are available to improve the strain's survival under different stresses; thus, it will not only grow but also produce beneficial products in harsh environments. In combination with rational metabolic engineering to study and analyze processes of adaptive evolution, evolutionary engineering is a powerful strategy for improving industrially important, complex properties of yeast. Evolutionary engineering is an emerging field that draws on the most recent advances from a wide range of scientific and technical disciplines.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available