Journal
PRECAMBRIAN RESEARCH
Volume 310, Issue -, Pages 133-152Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.precamres.2018.02.016
Keywords
Iron formation; Proterozoic; Microfossil; Carbon isotopes; Granules
Categories
Funding
- UCL
- London centre for Nanotechnology
- Engineering and Physical Science Research Council, UK
- NASA Astrobiology Institute [NNA04CC09A]
- Carnegie Institution of Washington
- W. M. Keck Foundation [2007-6-29]
- Carnegie of Canada
- National Natural Science Foundation of China [41272038]
- Geological Survey of Western Australia
- Changcheng Groups of China
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Toward the end of the Palaeoproterozoic era, over 10(9) billion tonnes of banded (BIF) and granular (GIF) iron formations were deposited on continental platforms. Granules in iron formations are typically sub-spherical structures 0.2 to 10 mm in size, whereas concretions are > 10 mm. Both types of spheroids are preserved throughout the sedimentological record. Their formation has typically been interpreted to originate from reworked Fe-rich sediments in high-energy, wave-agitated, shallow-marine environments. New evidence from six different late Palaeoproterozoic granular iron formations (GIF), however, suggests that some granules are the result of diagenetic reactions, in addition to other features driven by microbial processes and mechanical movements. Characteristic coarse grain interiors and septarian-type cracks inside granules, akin to those features in decimetre- to meter-size concretions, are interpreted as desiccation features from hydrated diagenetic environments where sulphate and/ or ferric iron were reduced while organic matter (OM) was oxidised inside granules. Those granules derived from sulphate reduction preserve diagenetic pyrite rims, whereas those formed via ferric iron reduction preserve diagenetic magnetite along their rims. Other diagenetic minerals including apatite mixed with OM, and various carbonate phases are commonly preserved within granules. Combined with systematically C-13-depleted carbonate, these diagenetic mineral assemblages point to the oxidative decay of OM as a major process involved in the formation of granules. Spheroidal equidistant haematite laminations surround some granules and contain apatite associated with carbonate, OM, and ferric-ferrous silicates, and oxides that further suggest these structures were not shaped by wave-action along sediment-water interfaces, but rather by chemical wave fronts and biomineralisation. Our results demonstrate that the formation mechanisms of GIF also involve microbial activity and chemically-oscillating reactions. As such, granules have excellent potential to be considered as promising biosignatures for studying Precambrian biogeochemistry, as well as astrobiology.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available