4.6 Article

Prognostic significance of NF-κB expression in non-small cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis

Journal

PLOS ONE
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198223

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81602423]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nuclear factor kappa B (NF-kappa B), a key nuclear transcription factor, is associated with prognosis in a variety of human cancers. However, the clinical value of NF-kB in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is still controversial. Therefore, the aim of this meta-analysis was to obtain an accurate evaluation of the relationship between NF-kappa B expression and survival prognosis of NSCLC patients based on published articles. PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science databases were systematically searched for potential articles. A total of 1159 patients from 7 eligible studies comparing prognostic significance of NF-kappa B expression levels in NSCLC were included in our meta-analysis. I 2 statistic and P value were performed to evaluate heterogeneity. The results of analysis were presented as hazard ratio (HR) or odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI). Subgroup analysis based on ethnicity of NSCLC patients and NF-kappa B cellular localization within cancer cells were conducted to illustrate the potential discrepancy. Significant heterogeneity was considered at l(2)>50% and P<0.05, and random-effects model was used. The combined results indicated that higher NF-kB expression was associated with shorter overall survival (OS) of NSCLC patients (HR = 2.78, 95% CI = 1.51-5.12, P = 0.001). Moreover, NF-kappa B expression was closely associated with tumor stage (HR = 0.32, 95% CI = 0.18-0.57, P<0.0001), lymph node metastasis (HR = 0.56, 95% CI = 0.38-0.83, P = 0.004) and 5-year OS for NSCLC patients (OR = 1.83, 95% CI = 1.02-3.31, P = 0.04). We conclude that NF-kB expression may be a potential unfavorable prognostic marker for NSCLC patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available