Do altmetrics correlate with the quality of papers? A large-scale empirical study based on F1000Prime data
Published 2018 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Do altmetrics correlate with the quality of papers? A large-scale empirical study based on F1000Prime data
Authors
Keywords
Altmetrics, Principal component analysis, Citation analysis, Twitter, Bibliometrics, Factor analysis, Regression analysis, Research quality assessment
Journal
PLoS One
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages e0197133
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Online
2018-05-24
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0197133
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Allegation of scientific misconduct increases Twitter attention
- (2018) Lutz Bornmann et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Context of altmetrics data matters: an investigation of count type and user category
- (2017) Houqiang Yu SCIENTOMETRICS
- Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: A review of the literature
- (2017) Cassidy R. Sugimoto et al. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
- Correction: Beyond Academia – Interrogating Research Impact in the Research Excellence Framework
- (2017) Emma Terama et al. PLoS One
- Measuring scientific impact beyond academia: An assessment of existing impact metrics and proposed improvements
- (2017) James Ravenscroft et al. PLoS One
- The ecstasy and the agony of the altmetric score
- (2016) Christian Gumpenberger et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Grand challenges in altmetrics: heterogeneity, data quality and dependencies
- (2016) Stefanie Haustein SCIENTOMETRICS
- Sampling issues in bibliometric analysis: Response to discussants
- (2016) Richard Williams et al. Journal of Informetrics
- Alternative metrics in scientometrics: a meta-analysis of research into three altmetrics
- (2015) Lutz Bornmann SCIENTOMETRICS
- Usefulness of altmetrics for measuring the broader impact of research
- (2015) Lutz Bornmann Aslib Journal of Information Management
- Interrater reliability and convergent validity of F1000Prime peer review
- (2015) Lutz Bornmann Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
- Modelling count response variables in informetric studies: Comparison among count, linear, and lognormal regression models
- (2015) Isola Ajiferuke et al. Journal of Informetrics
- How well developed are altmetrics? A cross-disciplinary analysis of the presence of ‘alternative metrics’ in scientific publications
- (2014) Zohreh Zahedi et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Do “altmetrics” correlate with citations? Extensive comparison of altmetric indicators with citations from a multidisciplinary perspective
- (2014) Rodrigo Costas et al. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
- Do altmetrics point to the broader impact of research? An overview of benefits and disadvantages of altmetrics
- (2014) Lutz Bornmann Journal of Informetrics
- Validity of altmetrics data for measuring societal impact: A study using data from Altmetric and F1000Prime
- (2014) Lutz Bornmann Journal of Informetrics
- Regression for citation data: An evaluation of different methods
- (2014) Mike Thelwall et al. Journal of Informetrics
- On exploratory factor analysis: A review of recent evidence, an assessment of current practice, and recommendations for future use
- (2013) Cadeyrn J. Gaskin et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES
- How to calculate the practical significance of citation impact differences? An empirical example from evaluative institutional bibliometrics using adjusted predictions and marginal effects
- (2013) Lutz Bornmann et al. Journal of Informetrics
Find the ideal target journal for your manuscript
Explore over 38,000 international journals covering a vast array of academic fields.
SearchCreate your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create Now