4.5 Article

Molecular Characterization and Expression of PFT, an FHB Resistance Gene at the Fhb1 QTL in Wheat

Journal

PHYTOPATHOLOGY
Volume 108, Issue 6, Pages 730-736

Publisher

AMER PHYTOPATHOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1094/PHYTO-11-17-0383-R

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Key Project for the Research and Development of China [2016YFD0101802, 2016YFE0112900]
  2. China Agricultural Research System program [CARS-03]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31561143004]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province, China [BK20170605]
  5. European Union Horizon 2020 Mycokey project [EU678781]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fusarium head blight (FHB) is a destructive fungal disease in wheat worldwide. Efforts have been carried out to combat this disease, and the pore-forming toxin-like (PFT) gene at the quantitative trait locus (QTL) Fhb1 was isolated and found to confer resistance to FHB in Sumai 3. In this study, we characterized PFT in 348 wheat accessions. Four haplotypes of PFT were identified. The wild haplotype of PFT had higher resistance than other haplotypes and explained 13.8% of phenotypic variation in FHB resistance by association analysis. PFT was highly expressed during early flowering and increased after Fusarium graminearum treatment in Sumai 3. Analysis of the 5' flanking sequence of PFT predicted that the cis elements of the PFT promoter were related to hormones and biological defense responses. However, PFT existed not only in the FHB-resistant accessions but also in some susceptible accessions. These results suggested that FHB resistance in a diverse range of wheat genotypes is partially conditioned by PFT. The profiling of FHB resistance and the PFT locus in this large collection of wheat germplasm may prove helpful for incorporating FHB resistance into wheat breeding programs, although more work is needed to reveal the exact role of the QTL Fhb1 in conferring resistance to fungal spread.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available