4.6 Article

Evenly spaced Detrended Fluctuation Analysis: Selecting the number of points for the diffusion plot

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2017.08.099

Keywords

Detrended Fluctuation Analysis; Even spacing; Diffusion plot; Method comparison; Gait variability

Funding

  1. Indiana Clinical and Translational Science Institute [UL1TR001108]
  2. National Science Foundation Dynamical Systems Program [CMMI-1300632]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Detrended Fluctuation Analysis (DFA) has become a widely-used tool to examine the correlation structure of a time series and provided insights into neuromuscular health and disease states. As the popularity of utilizing DFA in the human behavioral sciences has grown, understanding its limitations and how to properly determine parameters is becoming increasingly important. DFA examines the correlation structure of variability in a time series by computing a, the slope of the log SD-log n diffusion plot. When using the traditional DFA algorithm, the timescales, n, are often selected as a set of integers between a minimum and maximum length based on the number of data points in the time series. This produces non-uniformly distributed values of n in logarithmic scale, which influences the estimation of a due to a disproportionate weighting of the long-timescale regions of the diffusion plot. Recently, the evenly spaced DFA and evenly spaced average DFA algorithms were introduced. Both algorithms compute a by selecting k points for the diffusion plot based on the minimum and maximum timescales of interestand improve the consistency of a estimates for simulated fractional Gaussian noise and fractional Brownian motion time series. Two issues that remain unaddressed are (1) how to select k and (2) whether the evenly-spaced DFA algorithms show similar benefits when assessing human behavioral data. We manipulated k and examined its effects on the accuracy, consistency, and confidence limits of a in simulated and experimental time series. We demonstrate that the accuracy and consistency of a are relatively unaffected by the selection of k. However, the confidence limits of a narrow as k increases, dramatically reducing measurement uncertainty for single trials. We provide guidelines for selecting k and discuss potential uses of the evenly spaced DFA algorithms when assessing human behavioral data. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available