4.7 Article

A new point mutation in beta(2)-tubulin confers resistance to carbendazim in Fusarium asiaticum

Journal

PESTICIDE BIOCHEMISTRY AND PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 145, Issue -, Pages 15-21

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.pestbp.2017.12.006

Keywords

Fusarium asiaticum; Site-directed mutagenesis; Resistance; Carbendazim; beta-tubulin

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31730072, 31772190]
  2. Fund for Independent Innovation of Agricultural Science and Technology in Jiangsu Province of China [CX(15)1001]
  3. Henan Science and Technology Cooperation Project [172106000006]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Resistance to benzimidazole fungicides in many phytopathogenic fungi is caused by specific point mutations in the beta-tubulin gene (beta-tubulin). However, the mutated locus and genotype of beta-tubulin differ among phytopathogenic fungi. To validate the point mutation in Fusarium asiaticum beta(2)-tubulin that confers resistance to carbendazim and to analyze the molecular interaction between carbendazim and F. asiaticum beta(2)-tubulin. In this study, a new point mutation (GAG -> GCG, E198A) at codon 198 of beta(2)-ruhulin in a wild-type F. asiaticum strain was constructed by site-directed mutagenesis followed by a split marker strategy. The site-directed mutants were verified and exhibited a high level of resistance to carbendazim. In the absence of fungicide treatment, the biological characteristics did not differ between the site-directed mutants and the wild-type strain. Molecular docking between carbendazim and beta(2)-tubulin was carried out using the Surflex-Dock program in Sybyl X-2.0 version and the results indicated that the E198A mutation altered the configuration of beta(2)-tubulin, resulting in the change of the bonding sites and docking scores. We concluded that the point mutation of F. asiaticum beta(2)-tubulin conferring carbendazim resistance may not always be the bonding site for carbendazim.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available