4.7 Article

Management of Type 1 Diabetes With a Very Low-Carbohydrate Diet

Journal

PEDIATRICS
Volume 141, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

AMER ACAD PEDIATRICS
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2017-3349

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases [K24DK082730, K12DK094721]
  2. National Institutes of Health (NIH)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate glycemic control among children and adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) who consume a very low-carbohydrate diet (VLCD). METHODS: We conducted an online survey of an international social media group for people with T1DM who follow a VLCD. Respondents included adults and parents of children with T1DM. We assessed current hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) (primary measure), change in HbA1c after the self-reported beginning of the VLCD, total daily insulin dose, and adverse events. We obtained confirmatory data from diabetes care providers and medical records. RESULTS: Of 316 respondents, 131 (42%) were parents of children with T1DM, and 57% were of female sex. Suggestive evidence of T1DM (based on a 3-tier scoring system in which researchers took into consideration age and weight at diagnosis, pancreatic autoimmunity, insulin requirement, and clinical presentation) was obtained for 273 (86%) respondents. The mean age at diagnosis was 16 14 years, the duration of diabetes was 11 +/- 13 years, and the time following a VLCD was 2.2 +/- 3.9 years. Participants had a mean daily carbohydrate intake of 36 +/- 15 g. Reported mean HbA1c was 5.67% +/- 0.66%. Only 7 (2%) respondents reported diabetes-related hospitalizations in the past year, including 4 (1%) for ketoacidosis and 2 (1%) for hypoglycemia. CONCLUSIONS: Exceptional glycemic control of T1DM with low rates of adverse events was reported by a community of children and adults who consume a VLCD. The generalizability of these findings requires further studies, including high-quality randomized controlled trials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available