4.5 Article

Prenatal vitamin D status and respiratory and allergic outcomes in childhood: A meta-analysis of observational studies

Journal

PEDIATRIC ALLERGY AND IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 29, Issue 3, Pages 243-253

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/pai.12876

Keywords

allergy; asthma; meta-analysis; pregnancy; vitamin D

Funding

  1. Miguel Servet fellowship - Spanish Instituto de Salud Carlos III (Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness) [MS14/00046]
  2. Fondos FEDER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BackgroundPrenatal vitamin D status may influence offspring's respiratory and allergic outcomes; however, evidence is inconclusive. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted on the association between 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] levels in maternal blood in pregnancy or cord blood at birth with the risk of offspring's respiratory and allergic conditions. MethodsTwo independent researchers conducted systematic searches for observational studies published until May 2017 using defined keywords on vitamin D and health outcomes, including respiratory tract infections (RTIs), wheeze, asthma, atopic eczema, allergic rhinitis, allergic sensitization, and lung function. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted. ResultsA total of 34 from 547 retrieved articles were included. Increased prenatal exposure to 25(OH)D was inversely associated with risk of RTIs. Comparing the highest with the lowest category of 25(OH)D levels, the pooled odds ratio was 0.64 (95% CI 0.47, 0.87). A positive borderline association was found for lung function at school age (FEV1 z-score coefficient 0.07, 95% CI -0.01, 0.15). No associations were found for wheeze, asthma, atopic eczema, allergic rhinitis, and allergic sensitization. ConclusionThe introduction of public health measures to tackle vitamin D status in pregnancy may reduce the burden of RTIs in offspring. Current evidence does not support an impact on asthma and allergy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available