4.7 Article

A hyolithid without helens preserving the oldest hyolith muscle scars; palaeobiology of Paramicrocornus from the Shujingtuo Formation (Cambrian Series 2) of South China

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2017.07.021

Keywords

Operculum; Hyolithida; Tentaculate feeding organ; Functional morphology; Shell structure; Yangtze Platform

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41425008, 41720104002, 41772002, 41621003]
  3. National 973 program [2013CB835002]
  4. 111 projects of China [D17013]
  5. Swedish Research Council [VR2016-04610]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The hyolithid Paramicrocornus zhenbaensis from the lower Cambrian (Cambrian Series 2) Shuijingtuo Formation of southern Shaanxi and western Hubei provinces of the Yangtze Platform is well-preserved in three dimensions. The morphology of the conch and operculum of P.zhenbaensis shows that this species lacked helens, which are considered to be characteristic of hyolithids and hence Paramicrocornus may belong to a sister group of other hyolithids. The shell structure of P.zhenbaensis reveals close similarities to the shell structure of other hyolithids. Furthermore, the smaller size and non-radial orientation of tubules in the shell structure of the operculum also differ from that in orthothecid hyoliths, suggesting that this characteristic may be used to differentiate hyolithids and orthothecids. The phosphatized opercula of P. zhenbaensis exhibit a pair of muscle scars located close to the apex of the internal surface. These muscle scars, as well as similar structures in other hyolithids, probably served as attachment sites of muscles controlling the retraction of the tentaculate feeding organ recently discovered in hyolithids. Without helens, P. zhenbaensis may have been sessile with the conch partly buried in the sea floor. (C) 2017 Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available