4.6 Article

A Deep Phenotype Association Study Reveals Specific Phenotype Associations with Genetic Variants in Age-related Macular Degeneration Age-Related Eye Disease Study 2 (AREDS2) Report No. 14

Journal

OPHTHALMOLOGY
Volume 125, Issue 4, Pages 559-568

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.09.023

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Bayer Global Ophthalmology Awards Program
  2. National Eye Institute [EY000546, HHS-N-260-2005-00007-C, NO1-EY-5-0007, NOI-EY-0-2127]
  3. Nederlandse Oogonderzoek Stichting
  4. Dr. P. Binkhorst Stichting
  5. Stichting Dondersfonds
  6. Prins Bernhard Cultuurfonds
  7. Stichting A.F. Deutman Oogheelkunde Researchfonds
  8. NIH Medical Research Scholars Program
  9. NIH
  10. Office of Dietary Supplements
  11. National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine
  12. National Institute on Aging
  13. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
  14. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
  15. NIH Intramural Program, National Library of Medicine

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: Age-related macular degeneration (AMD), a multifactorial disease with variable phenotypic presentation, was associated with 52 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) at 34 loci in a genome-wide association study (GWAS). These genetic variants could modulate different biological pathways involved in AMD, contributing to phenotypic variability. To better understand the effects of these SNPs, we performed a deep phenotype association study (DeePAS) in the Age-Related Eye Disease Study 2 (AREDS2), followed by replication using AREDS participants, to identify genotype associations with AMD and non-AMD ocular and systemic phenotypes. Design: Cohort study. Participants: AREDS and AREDS2 participants. Methods: AREDS2 participants (discovery cohort) had detailed phenotyping for AMD; other eye conditions; cardiovascular, neurologic, gastrointestinal, and endocrine disease; cognitive function; serum nutrient levels; and others (total of 139 AMD and non-AMD phenotypes). Genotypes of the 52 GWAS SNPs were obtained. The DeePAS was performed by correlating the 52 SNPs to all phenotypes using logistic and linear regression models. Associations that reached Bonferroni-corrected statistical significance were replicated in AREDS. Main Outcome Measures: Genotypeephenotype associations. Results: A total of 1776 AREDS2 participants had 5 years follow-up; 1435 AREDS participants had 10 years. The DeePAS revealed a significant association of the rs3750846 SNP at the ARMS2/HTRA1 locus with subretinal/suberetinal pigment epithelial (RPE) hemorrhage related to neovascular AMD (odds ratio 1.55 [95% confidence interval 1.31-1.84], P = 2.67 x 10(-7)). This novel association remained significant after conditioning on participants with neovascular AMD (P = 2.42 x 10(-4)). Carriers of rs3750846 had poorer visual acuity during follow-up (P = 6.82 x 10(-7)) and were more likely to have a first-degree relative with AMD (P = 5.38 x 10(-6)). Two SNPs at the CFH locus, rs10922109 and rs570618, were associated with the drusen area in the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Report (ETDRS) grid (P = 2.29 x 10(-11) and P = 3.20 x 10(-9), respectively) and the center subfield (P = 1.24 x 10(-9) and P = 6.68 x 10(-8), respectively). SNP rs570618 was additionally associated with the presence of calcified drusen (P = 5.38 x 10(-6)). Except for positive family history of AMD with rs3750846, all genotypeephenotype associations were significantly replicated in AREDS. No pleiotropic associations were identified. Conclusions: The association of the SNP at the ARMS2/HTRA1 locus with subretinal/sub-RPE hemorrhage and poorer visual acuity and of SNPs at the CFH locus with drusen area may provide new insights in pathophysiological pathways underlying different stages of AMD. Published by Elsevier on behalf of the American Academy of Ophthalmology

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available