4.4 Article

Barrett's Esophagus after Bimodality Therapy in Patients with Esophageal Adenocarcinoma

Journal

ONCOLOGY
Volume 95, Issue 2, Pages 81-90

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000488489

Keywords

Esophageal adenocarcinoma; Barrett's esophagus; Endoscopy; Recurrence; Survival

Categories

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute and Department of Defense [CA129906, CA 127672, CA138671, CA172741]
  2. DOD [CA150334, CA162445]
  3. Caporella
  4. Dallas
  5. Sultan
  6. Park
  7. Smith
  8. Frazier
  9. Oaks
  10. Vanstekelenberg
  11. Planjery
  12. Cantu families
  13. Schecter Private Foundation
  14. Rivercreek Foundation
  15. Kevin Fund
  16. Myer Fund
  17. Dio Fund
  18. Milrod Fund
  19. University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (Houston, Texas, USA) multidisciplinary grant program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: Barrett's esophagus (BE) may be present in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) after bimodality therapy (BMT). There is no specific guidance for follow-up of these patients with regard to the presence of BE or dysplasia. In this study, we assessed the outcomes of patients who, after BMT, had BE and those who did not, Method: Patients with EAC who had BMT were identified and analyzed retrospectively in two groups, with and without BE. We compared patient characteristics and outcome variables (local, distant, and no recurrence), Results: Of 228 patients with EAC, 68 (29.8%) had BE before BMT. Ninety-eight (42.9%) had BE after BMT, and endoscopic intervention was done in 11 (11.2%). With a median follow-up of 37 months, the presence of post-BMT BE was not significantly associated with overall survival (OS) and local recurrence-free survival (LRFS). Similarly, endoscopic intervention was not significantly associated with OS and LRFS. Fifty (73,5%) patients with BE before BMT had BE after BMT (p < 0,0001). Conclusion:The presence of BE after BMT was not associated with increased risk of local recurrence. The local recurrence rate was not influenced by endoscopic intervention. Prospective studies are warranted to generate guidance for intervention, if necessary, for this group of EAC patients. (C) 2018 S Karger AG, Basel

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available