4.4 Article

Usefulness of Plasma Exosomal MicroRNA-451a as a Noninvasive Biomarker for Early Prediction of Recurrence and Prognosis of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Journal

ONCOLOGY
Volume 94, Issue 5, Pages 311-323

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000487006

Keywords

Biomarker; Exosome; Non-small cell lung cancer; MicroRNA-451a

Categories

Funding

  1. [17K10608]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [17K10655, 17K10608, 15K10150] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: The aim of this study was to clarify the usefulness of plasma exosomal microRNA-451a (miR-451a) as a novel biomarker for the early prediction of recurrence and prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients after curative resection. Methods: Before surgery, plasma samples were collected and exosomal microRNA (miRNA) levels were evaluated. We first profiled specific exosomal miRNAs related to recurrence in 6 NSCLC patients with stage IA cancer by miRNA microarray. We then validated the usefulness of selected miRNAs as biomarkers using the other 285 NSCLC patients. Results: Plasma exosomal miR-451a showed the highest upregulation in the NSCLC patients with recurrence in the miRNA microarray analysis. A significant positive correlation was demonstrated between exosomal miR-451a levels and NSCLC tissue miR-451a levels. Exosomal miR-451a showed a significant association with lymph node metastasis, vascular invasion, and stage. In stage I, II, or III patients, the overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates among the high-exosomal-miR-451a patients were significantly worse than those among the low-exosomal-miR-451a patients. In Cox multivariate analysis, exosomal miR-451a showed significance for OS and DFS. Conclusion: Plasma exosomal miR-451a might serve as a reliable biomarker for the prediction of recurrence and prognosis in NSCLC patients with stage I, II, or III cancer. (C) 2018 S. Karger AG, Basel

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available