4.7 Article

Differences in the Neighborhood Retail Food Environment and Obesity Among US Children and Adolescents by SNAP Participation

Journal

OBESITY
Volume 26, Issue 6, Pages 1063-1071

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/oby.22184

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Hopkins Population Center - National Institute of Child Health and Human Development at NIH [R24HD042854]
  2. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality [T32HS000055]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

ObjectiveThe goal of this study was to understand the association between children's neighborhood food access and overweight/obesity in a national sample of US households, and whether this association differs by Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) participation or household purchases. MethodsData were obtained from the National Household Food Acquisition and Purchase Survey (2012-2013; n=3,748 children aged 2 to 18 years). Logistic regression was used to examine associations between neighborhood retail food access (1 mile from home), food purchases (including sugary beverages), and overweight/obesity, stratified by SNAP status (1,720 participants, 453 eligible nonparticipants, 1,575 SNAP ineligible). Store types included supermarkets/grocery, combination grocery/other (independent drug, dollar, and general stores), convenience, fast food, and non-fast food restaurants. ResultsOdds of childhood overweight/obesity (OR [95% CI]) were higher with greater access to combination grocery/other stores overall (1.10 [1.03-1.17]) and for children in SNAP (1.14 [1.05-1.24]). Eligible non-SNAP children had higher odds of overweight/obesity with greater access to convenience stores (1.11 [1.04-1.18]). The average child lived in a household with 6.3% of total spending at food outlets on sugary beverages (SNAP: 8.3%, eligible non-SNAP: 7.7%, SNAP ineligible: 5.5%). ConclusionsGreater neighborhood access to combination grocery/other stores is associated with higher obesity prevalence for children overall and those in SNAP.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available