4.8 Article

Snapshots of an evolved DNA polymerase pre- and post-incorporation of an unnatural nucleotide

Journal

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
Volume 46, Issue 15, Pages 7977-7988

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gky552

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [1R41GM119434, R01GM128186]
  2. National Aeronautics and Space Administration [NNX15AF46G]
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [R41GM119434, R01GM128186] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The next challenge in synthetic biology is to be able to replicate synthetic nucleic acid sequences efficiently. The synthetic pair, 2-amino-8-(1-beta-D-2'-deoxyribofuranosyl) imidazo [1,2-a]-1,3,5-triazin-[8H]-4-one (trivially designated P) with 6-amino-3-(2'-deoxyribofuranosyl)-5-nitro-1H-pyridin-2-one (trivially designated Z), is replicated by certain Family A polymerases, albeit with lower efficiency. Through directed evolution, we identified a variant KlenTaq polymerase (M444V, P527A, D551E, E832V) that incorporates dZTP opposite P more efficiently than the wild-type enzyme. Here, we report two crystal structures of this variant KlenTaq, a post-incorporation complex that includes a template-primer with P:Z trapped in the active site (binary complex) and a pre-incorporation complex with dZTP paired to template P in the active site (ternary complex). In forming the ternary complex, the fingers domain exhibits a larger closure angle than in natural complexes but engages the template-primer and incoming dNTP through similar interactions. In the binary complex, although many of the interactions found in the natural complexes are retained, there is increased relative motion of the thumb domain. Collectively, our analyses suggest that it is the post-incorporation complex for unnatural substrates that presents a challenge to the natural enzyme and that more efficient replication of P:Z pairs requires a more flexible polymerase.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available