Assessment of cost drivers and cost variation for lumbar interbody fusion procedures using the Value Driven Outcomes database
Published 2018 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Assessment of cost drivers and cost variation for lumbar interbody fusion procedures using the Value Driven Outcomes database
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
Neurosurgical Focus
Volume 44, Issue 5, Pages E10
Publisher
Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)
Online
2018-05-01
DOI
10.3171/2018.1.focus17724
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- A cost-effectiveness comparisons of adult spinal deformity surgery in the United States and Japan
- (2017) Mitsuru Yagi et al. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL
- Assessment of Cost Drivers in Transsphenoidal Approaches for Resection of Pituitary Tumors Using the Value-Driven Outcome Database
- (2017) Michael Karsy et al. World Neurosurgery
- Implementation of a Value-Driven Outcomes Program to Identify High Variability in Clinical Costs and Outcomes and Association With Reduced Cost and Improved Quality
- (2016) Vivian S. Lee et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- A Cost-Effectiveness Comparison Between Open Transforaminal and Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusions Using the Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio at 2-Year Follow-up
- (2016) Gurpreet S. Gandhoke et al. NEUROSURGERY
- Laminectomy plus Fusion versus Laminectomy Alone for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
- (2016) Zoher Ghogawala et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- An Outcome and Cost Analysis Comparing Single-Level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Intraoperative Fluoroscopy versus Computed Tomography–Guided Navigation
- (2016) Ryan Khanna et al. World Neurosurgery
- Cost minimization in treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis
- (2015) Omar M. Uddin et al. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE
- The National Neurosurgery Quality and Outcomes Database Qualified Clinical Data Registry: 2015 measure specifications and rationale
- (2015) Scott L. Parker et al. Neurosurgical Focus
- Posterolateral Lumbar Arthrodesis With and Without Interbody Arthrodesis for L4–L5 Degenerative Spondylolisthesis
- (2015) Michael B. Gottschalk et al. SPINE
- Geographic Variations in the Cost of Spine Surgery
- (2015) Vadim Goz et al. SPINE
- A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Minimally Invasive versus Open Surgery Techniques for Lumbar Spinal Fusion in Italy and the United Kingdom
- (2015) Simona Vertuani et al. VALUE IN HEALTH
- Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 1: Introduction and methodology
- (2014) Michael G. Kaiser et al. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE
- Value Driven Outcomes (VDO): a pragmatic, modular, and extensible software framework for understanding and improving health care costs and outcomes
- (2014) Kensaku Kawamoto et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION
- Is Minimal Access Spine Surgery More Cost-effective Than Conventional Spine Surgery?
- (2014) Daniel Lubelski et al. SPINE
- Cost savings analysis of intrawound vancomycin powder in posterior spinal surgery
- (2014) Osa Emohare et al. Spine Journal
- Evidence-Based Review of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Is Minimally Invasive Better?
- (2013) Paul E. Kaloostian et al. World Neurosurgery
- Minimally Invasive versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: Comparative Effectiveness and Cost-Utility Analysis
- (2013) Scott L. Parker et al. World Neurosurgery
- Expenditures and Health Status Among Adults With Back and Neck Problems
- (2008) Brook I. Martin JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
Add your recorded webinar
Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.
Upload NowBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started