4.3 Article

Corticomuscular coherence reflects somatosensory feedback gains during motor adaptation

Journal

NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH
Volume 131, Issue -, Pages 10-18

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neures.2017.09.004

Keywords

Sensorimotor binding; Long latency reflex; Reaching movement; Force field

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) [25702034]
  2. MEXT [15H05880, 25750267]
  3. Keio Institute of Pure and Applied Sciences (KiPAS)
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [25750267, 25702034] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Beta-band corticomuscular coherence (CMC) observed between the sensorimotor cortex activity and contracting muscle is declaratively described as a neurophysiological reflection of sensorimotor binding. However, much remains unknown about the functional meaning of 'sensorimotor binding.' The efficacy of information binding in the sensorimotor system is assumed to be influenced by the gain of the feedback controller, which is regulated through a process that may in part be implemented in the primary sensorimotor cortex (SMI). Thus, we predicted that CMC is modulated together with feedback gains during motor learning. We examined this hypothesis using a hand-reaching adaptation task under a novel dynamical environment. CMC modulation was assessed before and after adaptation, and feedback gains were probed by long latency triggered muscle reactions. Overall, we found that CMC significantly decreased during the adaptation period, and such CMC decrease was associated with the decreased long latency reflexes. These results suggest that CMC has a related function to modulation of feedback gains. Our findings provided an electrophysiological hallmark of the sensorimotor binding process, which was stated as a function of CMC but poorly understood. (C) 2017 Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available