4.8 Article

Semi-transparent polymer solar cells with all-copper nanowire electrodes

Journal

NANO RESEARCH
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages 1956-1966

Publisher

TSINGHUA UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s12274-017-1812-z

Keywords

Cu nanowires; transparent electrode; semi-transparent polymer solar cells; lamination

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61301036]
  2. Shanghai Science and Technology Rising Star Project [17QA1404700]
  3. Youth Innovation Promotion Association CAS [2014226]
  4. Shanghai Key Basic Research Project [16JC1402300]
  5. Major State Research Development Program of China [2016YFA0203000]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Transparent electrodes based on copper nanowires (Cu NWs) have attracted significant attention owing to their advantages including high optical transmittance, good conductivity, and excellent mechanical flexibility. However, low-cost, high-performance, and environmental friendly solar cells with all-Cu NW electrodes have not been realized until now. Herein, top and bottom transparent electrodes based on Cu NWs with low surface roughness and homogeneous conductivity are fabricated. Then, semi-transparent polymer solar cells (PSCs) with the inverted structure of polyacrylate/Cu NWs/poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):poly(styrenesulfonate) (PEDOT:PSS) (PH1000)/Y-TiO2/poly(3-hexylthiophene):[6,6]-phenyl-C-61-butyric acid 3,4,5-tris(octyloxy) benzyl/PEDOT:PSS (4083)/Cu NWs/polyimide/polydimethylsiloxane are constructed; these could absorb light from both sides with a power conversion efficiency reaching 1.97% and 1.85%. Furthermore, the PSCs show an average transmittance of 42% in the visible region, which renders them suitable for some specialized applications such as power-generating windows and building-integrated photovoltaics. The indium tin oxide (ITO)- and noble metal-free PSCs could pave new pathways for fabricating cost-effective semi-transparent PSCs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available