4.4 Article

Convective Storm Life Cycle and Environments near the Sierras de Cordoba, Argentina

Journal

MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW
Volume 146, Issue 8, Pages 2541-2557

Publisher

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/MWR-D-18-0081.1

Keywords

Climatology; Convective storms; Mesoscale processes; Storm environments; Radars; Radar observations; Reanalysis data

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [AGS-1661799, AGS-1661800, AGS-1661657]
  2. Directorate For Geosciences
  3. Div Atmospheric & Geospace Sciences [1661657] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Satellite observations have revealed that some of the world's most intense deep convective storms occur near the Sierras de Cordoba, Argentina, South America. A C-band, dual-polarization Doppler weather radar recently installed in the city of Cordoba in 2015 is now providing a high-resolution radar perspective of this intense convection. Radar data from two austral spring and summer seasons (2015-17) are used to document the convective life cycle, while reanalysis data are utilized to construct storm environments across this region. Most of the storms in the region are multicellular and initiate most frequently during the early afternoon and late evening hours near and just east of the Sierras de Cordoba. Annually, the peak occurrence of these storms is during the austral summer months of December, January, and February. These Cordoba radar-based statistics are shown to be comparable to statistics derived from Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission Precipitation Radar data. While generally similar to storm environments in the United States, storm environments in central Argentina tend to be characterized by larger CAPE and weaker low-level vertical wind shear. One of the more intriguing results is the relatively fast transition from first storms to larger mesoscale convective systems, compared with locations in the central United States.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available