4.7 Article

Spatially offset AGN candidates in the CLASS survey

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 475, Issue 4, Pages 5179-5193

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty114

Keywords

galaxies: active; galaxies: interactions; galaxies: nuclei

Funding

  1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  2. STFC [ST/P000649/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/P000649/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Prompted by a recent claim by Barrows et al. that X-ray active galactic nuclei (AGNs) are often found significantly offset from the centres of their host galaxies, we have looked for examples of compact radio sources that are offset from the optical centroids of nearby (z < 0.2) galaxies. We have selected a sample of 345 galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) galaxy catalogue, which have nearby compact radio sources listed in the Cosmic-Lens All Sky Survey (CLASS) catalogue. We find only three matches (similar to 0.87 per cent of the sample) with offsets greater than 600 milliarcsec (mas), which is considerably fewer than we would have expected from the Barrows et al. X-ray survey. We fit our histogram of offsets with a Rayleigh distribution with sigma = 60.5 mas, but find that there is an excess of objects with separations greater than similar to 150 mas. Assuming that this excess represents AGNs with real offsets, we place an upper limit of similar to 17 per cent on the fraction of offset AGNs in our radio-selected sample. We select 38 objects with offsets greater than 150 mas, and find they have some diverse properties: Some are well known, such as Mrk 273 and Arp 220, some have dust lanes, which may have affected the optical astrometry, and a few are strong new candidates for offset AGNs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available