Journal
MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 479, Issue 1, Pages 1021-1054Publisher
OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty1413
Keywords
(cosmology:) cosmological parameters; (cosmology:) distance scale; (cosmology:) large-scale structure of Universe; cosmology: theory
Categories
Funding
- U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of High Energy Physics [DE-SC0014329]
- U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-76SF00515]
- Bezos Fellowship
- STFC
- Ernest Rutherford Fellowship scheme
- U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0014329] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Future Baryon Acoustic Oscillation surveys aim at observing galaxy clustering over a wide range of redshift and galaxy populations at great precision, reaching tenths of a percent, in order to detect any deviation of dark energy from the lambda cold dark matter (ACDM) model, We utilize a set of paired quasi-N-body FastPM simulations that were designed to mitigate the sample variance effect on the BAO feature and evaluated the BAO systematics as precisely as similar to 0.01 percent, We report anisotropic BAO scale shifts before and after density field reconstruction in the presence of redshift-space distortions over a wide range of redshift, galaxy/halo biases, and shot noise levels, We test different reconstruction schemes and different smoothing filter scales, and introduce physically motivated BAO fitting models, For the first time, we derive a Galilean-invariant infrared resummed model for halos in real and redshift space. We test these models from the perspective of robust BAO measurements and non-BAO information such as growth rate and non-linear bias. We find that pre-reconstruction BAO scale has moderate fitting-model dependence at the level of 0.1-0.2 per cent for matter while the dependence is substantially reduced to less than 0.07 per cent for halos. We find that post-reconstruction BAO shifts are generally reduced to below 0.1 per cent in the presence of galaxy/halo bias and show much smaller fitting model dependence. Different reconstruction conventions can potentially make a much larger difference on the line-of-sight BAO scale, upto 0.3 percent. Meanwhile, the precision (error) of the BAO measurements is quite consistent regardless of the choice of the fitting model or reconstruction convention.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available