4.3 Article

Molecular dynamics simulation of the size-dependent morphological stability of cubic shape silver nanoparticles

Journal

MOLECULAR SIMULATION
Volume 44, Issue 12, Pages 981-991

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/08927022.2018.1469751

Keywords

Silver nanoparticle; nanocube; sharp-edged; Lennard-Jones potential; molecular dynamics simulations; PVA

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine [0116U000834]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The morphological stability of sharp-edged silver nanoparticles is examined by the classical molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. The crystalline structure and the perfect fcc atom packing of a series of silver nanocubes (AgNC) of different sizes varying from 63 up to 1099 atoms are compared against quasi-spherical nanoparticles of the same sizes at temperature 303K. Our MD simulations demonstrate that starting from the preformed perfect crystalline structures the cubic shape is preserved for AgNCs composed of 365-1099 atoms. Surprisingly, the rapid loss of the cubic shape morphology and transformation into the non-fcc-structure are found for smaller AgNCs composed of less than similar to 256 atoms. No such loss of the preformed crystalline structure is seen for quasi-spherical nanoparticles composed of 38-1007 atoms. The analysis of the temperature dependence and the binding energy of outermost Ag surface atoms suggests that the loss of the perfect cubic shape, rounding and smoothing of sharp edges and corners are driven by the tendency towards the increase in their coordination number. In addition, we revealed that AgNC1099 partially loses its sharp edges and corners in the aqueous environment; however, the polymer coating with poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) was able to preserve the well-defined cubic morphology. Finally, these results help improve the understanding of the role of surface capping agents in solution phase synthesis of Ag nanocubes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available