4.7 Article

Bacterial Cytological Profiling Reveals the Mechanism of Action of Anticancer Metal Complexes

Journal

MOLECULAR PHARMACEUTICS
Volume 15, Issue 8, Pages 3404-3416

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.8b00407

Keywords

cancer; drug discovery; cisplatin; ruthenium; bacterial cytological profiling

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01GM107586]
  2. University of Kentucky Opportunity Fellowship
  3. Office of the Vice President for Research
  4. Markey Cancer Center
  5. NCI Center Core Support Grant [P30 CA177558]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Target identification and mechanistic studies of cytotoxic agents are challenging processes that are both time-consuming and costly. Here we describe an approach to mechanism of action studies for potential anticancer compounds by utilizing the simple prokaryotic system, E. coli, and we demonstrate its utility with the characterization of a ruthenium polypyridyl complex [Ru(bpy)(2)dmbp(2+)]. Expression of the photoconvertible fluorescent protein Dendra2 3 facilitated both high throughput studies and single-cell imaging. This allowed for simultaneous ratiometric analysis of inhibition of protein production and phenotypic investigations. The profile of protein production, filament size and population, and nucleoid morphology revealed important differences between inorganic agents that damage DNA vs more selective inhibitors of transcription and translation. Trace metal analysis demonstrated that DNA is the preferred nucleic acid target of the ruthenium complex, but further studies in human cancer cells revealed altered cell signaling pathways compared to the commonly administrated anticancer agent cisplatin. This study demonstrates E. coli can be used to rapidly distinguish between compounds with disparate mechanisms of action and also for more subtle distinctions within in studies in mammalian cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available