4.7 Article

Hierarchical porous carbon activated by CaCO3 from pigskin collagen for CO2 and H-2 adsorption

Journal

MICROPOROUS AND MESOPOROUS MATERIALS
Volume 260, Issue -, Pages 172-179

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2017.08.048

Keywords

Pigskin; CaCO3 activation; Hierarchical porous carbon; Adsorption

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51372012, 51432003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Porous carbon materials have drawn a great attention due to the remarkable pore structure, high specific surface area, large pore volume, excellent property of adsorption and separation. Biomass based carbon was widely concerned because of low cost, environmentally friendly and sustainability. We successfully prepared nitrogen-doped porous carbons by carbonizing collagen and CaCO3 farrago at different temperatures without any further activation. The as-prepared sample at 900 degrees C shows a large specific surface area of 2799 m(2) g(-1) and a high pore volume of 1.91 cm(3) g(-1). And the sample at 600 degrees C shows a relatively high nitrogen content and a large amount of narrow micropores (<0.7 nm), which endows this sample moderate CO2 adsorption capacity (1.27 mmol g(-1) at 298 K under 0.15 bar, 4.4 mmol g(-1) at 298 K under 1 bar and 5.3 mmol g(-1) at 273 K under 1 bar). The maximum hydrogen uptake of 2.49 wt% at 77 K under 1.13 bar can be observed when carbonization temperature goes to 800 degrees C. The CO2 uptake is influenced by narrow micropore (<0.7 nm) volume, meanwhile CO2 uptake is improved by high nitrogen content. And specific surface area and total pore volume make important roles for hydrogen uptake. Small mesopores of size between 2 and 3 nm also contribute to hydrogen adsorption. These results prove that collagen based porous carbon is a desirable candidate for industrially CO2 capture and H-2 storage. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available