4.1 Article

Endovascular shedding markers in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: Results from a single-center exploratory study

Journal

MICROCIRCULATION
Volume 25, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/micc.12432

Keywords

glycocalyx; hyaluronic acid; outcome; syndecan-1; systolic heart failure

Funding

  1. foundation Limburg Sterk Merk (LSM)
  2. Hasselt University
  3. Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg
  4. Jessa Hospital
  5. Research Foundation-Flanders (FWO) [1127917N]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Endothelial glycocalyx degradation has been associated with multiple pathophysiological processes in cardiovascular disease. Aims: To explore the role of glycocalyx shedding markers in pathophysiology of HFrEF. Methods: In 123 HFrEF patients, the concentration, prognostic value, and association of glycocalyx shedding markers with other disease processes were investigated. Results: Median HA levels and syndecan-1 levels in HFrEF patients were, respectively, 29.4 (10.7;61.6) ng/mL and 48.5 (33.6;80.8) ng/mL. Overall, HA-levels were significantly higher in HFrEF patients compared to healthy subjects, but only 31% of HFrEF patients had HA-levels above the cutoff of normal. There was no significant difference among HFrEF patients and healthy subjects regarding syndecan-1 levels. HFrEF patients with elevated HA-levels had a significantly worse outcome (log rank = 0.01) which remained significant after correction for established risk factors (HR 2.53 (1.13-5.69); P = .024). There was no significant relation between levels of shedding markers and neurohumoral activation (PRA, serum aldosterone, NT-proBNP), myocardial injury (HS-trop), inflammation (CRP), or other baseline characteristics. Conclusions: The glycocalyx shedding marker HA is significantly elevated in a subgroup of HFrEF patients and an independent predictor for worse clinical outcome. Glycocalyx shedding might be an additional factor in the pathophysiology of HF which warrants further investigation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available