4.2 Article

Resistance in In Vitro Selected Tigecycline-Resistant Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Sequence Type 5 Is Driven by Mutations in mepR and mepA Genes

Journal

MICROBIAL DRUG RESISTANCE
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages 519-526

Publisher

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/mdr.2017.0279

Keywords

tigecycline; MRSA; MepR; MepA

Funding

  1. Sao Paulo Research Foundation [FAPESP 2010/02619-0, FAPESP 2013/24952-0]
  2. Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel [CAPES/PVE 88881.030524/2013-01, CAPES 88887.114824/2015-00]
  3. National Institutes of Health (DHHS/NIH/NIAID) [AI072360, AI083214, AI109855]
  4. NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE [K99EY028222] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  5. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES [P01AI083214] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A tigecycline-susceptible (TGC-S) Sequence Type (ST) 5 clinical methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strain was cultured in escalating levels of tigecycline, yielding mutants eightfold more resistant. Their genomes were sequenced to identify genetic alterations, resulting in resistance. Alterations in rpsJ, commonly related to tigecycline resistance, were also investigated. Tigecycline resistance was mediated by loss-of-function mutations in the transcriptional repressor mepR, resulting in derepression of the efflux pump mepA. Increased levels of resistance were obtained by successive mutations in mepA itself. No alterations in RpsJ were observed in selected strains, but we observed a K57M substitution, previously correlated with resistance, among TGC-S clinical strains. Thus, the pathway to tigecycline resistance in CC5 MRSA in vitro appears to be derepression of mep operon as the result of mepR loss-of-function mutation, followed by alterations in MepA efflux pump. This shows that other evolutionary pathways, besides mutation of rpsJ, are available for evolving tigecycline resistance in CC5 MRSA.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available