4.7 Article

Design and terramechanics analysis of a Mars rover utilising active suspension

Journal

MECHANISM AND MACHINE THEORY
Volume 128, Issue -, Pages 125-149

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2018.05.002

Keywords

Angle-adjusting mechanism; Planetary gear train; Active suspension; Mars rover

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51275106, 51405109]
  2. '111' Project [B07018]
  3. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-10-0055]
  4. Chinese State Key Laboratory of Robotics and System Foundation [HIT.KLOF.2010057]
  5. Self-Planned Task of State Key Laboratory of Robotics and System (HIT) [SKLRS201501B]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Wheeled rovers have a limited ability to traverse soft terrains and climb loose slopes. This study proposes a wheel-step rover with a modified active rocker-bogie suspension. The rocker and differential shaft fixed to the rocker are divided into three parts and reconnected via a novel angle-adjusting mechanism. The mechanism, which is driven by a single motor, widens and narrows the angle between the two rocker parts periodically to generate a wheel-step motion. Moreover, it adjusts the angle between a rocker part and differential shaft part to keep the bottom side of the rover body parallel to the ground. When fully stretched, the suspension lowers the bottom side horizontally to the lander platform. The mechanism also cooperates with a brake added between a rocker part and bogie to lift the sunken wheels separately. The strategies of wheel-step motion, wheel lifting, and suspension folding/unfolding are practicable as validated by prototype tests. Experiments show that the active suspension considerably enhances the rover's ability to escape from a dune or a crater. The proposed suspension is an important attempt in improving the design of Chinese Mars rovers. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available