4.4 Article

Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MRI for predicting response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer

Journal

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
Volume 48, Issue -, Pages 27-33

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2017.12.018

Keywords

Diffusion; Breast neoplasms; Neoadjuvant therapy; Magnetic resonance imaging

Funding

  1. Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI)
  2. Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea [HI14C1062]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To determine the diagnostic performance of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) diffusion-weighted (DW) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) parameters in predicting response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in breast cancer patients. Materials and methods: Forty-six patients with stage II or III breast cancer underwent MRI including DW imaging with 10 b values before and after 2 cycles of NAC. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and IVIM parameters (D, D*, and f) were obtained using histogram analysis derived from whole-tumor volumes. After surgery, imaging parameters were compared with histopathologic responses using the Miller-Payne grading system. Results: Before NAC, D-50, and D-75 were higher in good responders than in minor responders (P <= 0.043). After NAC, ADC(mean), ADC(50), ADC(75), D-mean D-25, D-50, and D-75 were higher in good responders (P <= 0.037). Skewness of ADC and D were lower in good responders after NAC (P <= 0.005). Most histogram metrics of posttreatment ADC and D had similar AUC values with reasonable accuracy for prediction of good response (AUC >= 0.7, P < 0.05). Conclusion: D and ADC are useful for the prediction of response to NAC in breast cancer patients. Additional information is obtained by application of the IVIM model in DW imaging analysis and histogram analysis using whole-tumor volume data.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available