4.3 Article

Ex-vivo sensitivity profiling to guide clinical decision making in acute myeloid leukemia: A pilot study

Journal

LEUKEMIA RESEARCH
Volume 64, Issue -, Pages 34-41

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.leukres.2017.11.008

Keywords

Acute myeloid leukemia; Ex-vivo sensitivity screening; Precision medicine

Funding

  1. Miami Clinical and Translational Science Institute
  2. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences [1KL2TR000461]
  3. Paps Corps Champions for Cancer Research
  4. National Institutes of Health [R21CA202488, R01NS092671, R01MH110441]
  5. Broward Community Foundation (Fort Lauderdale, FL)
  6. Pap Corps Champions for Cancer Research (Deerfield Beach, FL)
  7. NIH [DA035592, DA035055, AA023781]
  8. Florida Department of Health [6AZ08, 7AZ26]
  9. NATIONAL CENTER FOR ADVANCING TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCES [KL2TR000461] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  10. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH [R01MH110441] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  11. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE [R21NS056950, R01NS092671] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  12. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON ALCOHOL ABUSE AND ALCOHOLISM [R01AA023781] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  13. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE [R01DA035055] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A precision medicine approach is appealing for use in AML due to ease of access to tumor samples and the significant variability in the patients' response to treatment. Attempts to establish a precision medicine platform for AML, however, have been unsuccessful, at least in part due to the use of small compound panels and having relatively slow turn over rates, which restricts the scope of treatment and delays its onset. For this pilot study, we evaluated a cohort of 12 patients with refractory AML using an ex vivo drug sensitivity testing (DST) platform. Purified AML blasts were screened with a panel of 215 FDA-approved compounds and treatment response was evaluated after 72 h of exposure. Drug sensitivity scoring was reported to the treating physician, and patients were then treated with either DST- or non-DST guided therapy. We observed survival benefit of DST-guided therapy as compared to the survival of patients treated according to physician recommendation. Three out of four DST-treated patients displayed treatment response, while all of the non-DST-guided patients progressed during treatment. DST rapidly and effectively provides personalized treatment recommendations for patients with refractory AML.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available