4.4 Article

Parameters in fractional laser assisted delivery of topical anesthetics: Role of laser type and laser settings

Journal

LASERS IN SURGERY AND MEDICINE
Volume 50, Issue 8, Pages 813-818

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/lsm.22936

Keywords

drug delivery; fractional laser; topical anesthesia; CO2 laser; Er:YAG laser

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and ObjectivesEfficacy of topical anesthetics can be enhanced by pretreatment of the skin with ablative fractional lasers. However, little is known about the role of parameters such as laser modality and laser density settings in this technique. Aims of this study were to compare the efficacy of pretreatment with two different ablative fractional laser modalities, a CO2 laser and an Er:YAG laser, and to assess the role of laser density in ablative fractional laser assisted topical anesthesia. Study Design/Materials and MethodsIn each of 15 healthy subjects, four 10x10mm test regions on the back were randomized to pretreatment (70-75m ablation depth) with CO2 laser at 5% density, CO2 laser at 15% density, Er:YAG laser at 5% density or Er:YAG laser at 15% density. Articaine hydrochloride 40mg/ml+epinephrine 10g/ml solution was applied under occlusion to all four test regions. After 15 minutes, a pass with the CO2 laser (1,500m ablation depth) was administered as pain stimulus to each test region. A reference pain stimulus was given on unanesthetized skin. The main outcome parameter, pain, was scored on a 0-10 visual analogue scale (VAS) after each pain stimulus. ResultsMedian VAS scores were 1.50 [CO2 5%], 0.50 [CO2 15%], 1.50 [Er:YAG 5%], 0.43 [Er:YAG 15%], and 4.50 [unanesthetized reference]. VAS scores for all pretreated test regions were significantly lower compared to the untreated reference region (P<0.01). We found no significant difference in VAS scores between the CO2 and the Er:YAG laser pretreated regions. However, VAS scores were significantly lower at 15% density compared to 5% density for both for the CO2 laser (P<0.05) and the Er:YAG laser (P<0.01). Pretreatment with the CO2 laser was considered slightly more painful than pretreatment with Er:YAG laser by the subjects. ConclusionFractional laser assisted topical anesthesia is effective even with very low energy settings and an occlusion time of only 15 minutes. Both the CO2 laser and the Er:YAG laser can be used to assist topical anesthesia although the CO2 laser pretreatment is experienced as more painful. In our study settings, using articaine/epinephrine solution and an occlusion time of 15 minutes, a density of 15% was more effective than 5%. Lasers Surg. Med. 50:813-818, 2018. (c) 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available