4.4 Article

Genotype-Phenotype Analysis in Pediatric Patients with Distal Renal Tubular Acidosis

Journal

KIDNEY & BLOOD PRESSURE RESEARCH
Volume 43, Issue 2, Pages 513-521

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000488698

Keywords

Distal renal tubular acidosis; Mutations; Sensorineural hearing loss; Nephrocalcinosis; Chronic kidney disease; Growth retardation

Funding

  1. Korean Health Technology RAMP
  2. D Project, Ministry of Health Welfare [HI12C0014]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background/Aims: Primary distal renal tubular acidosis (dRTA) in children is a rare genetic disorder, and three causative mutated genes have been identified: SLC4A1, ATP6V1B1, and ATP6V0A4. We analyzed the prevalence and phenotypic differences of genetic mutations in children with dRTA. Methods: A total of 17 children with dRTA were enrolled in the study. All patients underwent genetic testing for all three candidate genes. Results: Pathogenic mutations, including six novel mutations, were detected in 15 (88.2%) patients: dominant SLC4A1 mutations in ten (58.8%) patients, recessive ATP6V0A4 mutations in three (17.6%) patients, and recessive ATP6V1B1 mutations in two (11.8%) patients. Compared to other patients, patients with SLC4A1 mutations showed an older age of onset (3.7 +/- 2.6 years) and less severe metabolic acidosis at initial presentation. All patients developed nephrocalcinosis, and sensorineural hearing loss was observed in two patients with ATP6V1B1 mutations. Three (17.6%) patients had decreased renal function (chronic kidney disease stage 2), and five (29.4%) patients had persistent growth retardation at the last follow-up. Long-term prognosis showed no genotype-phenotype correlation. Conclusions: SLC4A1 is the most common defective gene in Korean children with dRTA. Patients with SLC4A1 mutations show later onset and milder disease severity. Long-term follow-up of hearing ability, renal function, and growth is necessary for patients with (C) 2018 The Author(s) Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available