4.7 Review

Expected advances in human fertility treatments and their likely translational consequences

Journal

JOURNAL OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE
Volume 16, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12967-018-1525-4

Keywords

Infertility; Gametes; Zygotes; Embryos; Cell lineage determination; Mosaicism; Maternal tolerance; Invasiveness; Implantation; Ovarian cycle

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Due to rapid research progress in reproductive biology and reproductive clinical endocrinology, many human infertility treatments are close to potential breakthroughs and translational applications. We here review current barriers, where such breakthroughs will likely come from, what they will entail, and their potential clinical applications. Main text: The radical nature of change will primarily benefit older women, reduce fertility treatment costs and thereby expand access to treatment. A still widely overlooked prerequisite for implantation and normal pregnancy maintenance is timely development of maternal immunological tolerance toward an implanting paternal semiallograft, if malfunctioning associated with implantation failure and pregnancy loss, while premature termination of tolerance appears associated with premature labor, pre-eclampsia/eclampsia and gestoses of pregnancy. Common denominators between pregnancy and invasive malignancies have again been attracting attention, suggesting that, like in malignant tumors, degrees of embryo aneuploidy may affect invasiveness and ability to disarm the immune system's innate response against implanting embryos. Linking tolerance to implantation, we offer evidence that the so-called implantation window is likely immunological rather than hormonally defined. Conclusions: Because many here outlined treatment changes will disproportionally benefit older women, they will exert a pronounced effect on society, as increasing numbers of women at grandparental ages will become mothers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available