4.7 Article

Suitability of fluorescence indices for the estimation of fruit maturity compounds in tomato fruits

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE SCIENCE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE
Volume 98, Issue 15, Pages 5656-5665

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.9111

Keywords

chlorophyll fluorescence; nondestructive sensors; maturity stages; tomato; fruit quality

Funding

  1. Bioeconomy Science Center - Federal Ministry of Innovation, Science and Research [313/323-400-002 13]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND We examined the suitability of chlorophyll fluorescence-based indices to monitor and predict concentrations of fruit maturity compounds during tomato ripening under different growing conditions in the greenhouse. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of chlorophyll concentration changes on fluorescence-based indices and to exploit the relation between fluorescence and reflectance indices with the corresponding maturity compounds determined analytically. RESULTS CONCLUSION Fruits grown under water deficit matured faster than control fruits as recorded with fluorescence-based indices. The SFR_R index correlated well with the analytical determination of chlorophyll content, whereas the single-signal FRF_G correlated with lycopene content even if the sensor was unable to differentiate precisely between maturity stages 2 to 4. Neither the FLAV index nor the FLAV_UV index was suitable for flavonoid prediction in tomato fruits. Compared with fluorescence indices, the relation between the reflection index and pigment concentrations was lower for chlorophyll and higher for lycopene. Chlorophyll and lycopene content in tomato fruits can be estimated by means of fluorescence indices during the pre-harvest phase. Since the chlorophyll decrease during tomato ripening is the driving force affecting all fluorescence signals, the methods are not reliable for estimation of other maturity compounds in tomato fruits. (c) 2018 Society of Chemical Industry

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available