4.7 Article

Effects of washing, soaking and domestic cooking on cadmium, arsenic and lead bioaccessibilities in rice

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE SCIENCE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE
Volume 98, Issue 10, Pages 3829-3835

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.8897

Keywords

heavy metals; rice cooking; bioaccessibility; health risk assessment

Funding

  1. State Key Research and Development Plan [2017YFD0400200]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31601417]
  3. Foundation for University Young Key Teachers of Henan Province [2016GGJS-071]
  4. Henan University of Technology [2014YWQQ03]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUNDThe health risk of heavy metals such as cadmium (Cd), arsenic (As) and lead (Pb) in rice can be assessed by their concentration and bioaccessibility. In this work, japonica cultivar Xinfeng 2 and indica cultivar T-You 15 were washed, soaked and cooked using three common domestic cooking methods. The present study investigated the effects of washing, soaking, normal cooking, high-pressure cooking and microwave cooking on the concentration, bioaccessibility and health risk of Cd, As and Pb in rice. RESULTSWashing significantly reduced concentrations of Cd, As and Pb, and all three types of cooking reduced bioaccessibilities of these elements. No significant differences in bioaccessibility were observed among rice prepared with different cooking methods. Concentrations and bioaccessibilities of Cd, As and Pb highly affected the values of average daily dose, hazard quotient and lifetime cancer risk. High concentration and bioaccessibility cause As to pose non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic health risks to adults and children. Moreover, compared with adults, children have a high chance of exposure to non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic health risks. CONCLUSIONWashing and cooking of rice lowered the health risk by reducing Cd, As and Pb concentrations and bioaccessibilities respectively. (c) 2018 Society of Chemical Industry

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available