4.5 Article

Serum transthyretin level is associated with prognosis of patients with gastric cancer

Journal

JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH
Volume 227, Issue -, Pages 145-150

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.02.035

Keywords

Gastric cancer; Prognosis; Transthyretin; Prealbumin; Malnutrition; Overall survival

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The goal of the present study was to determine whether serum transthyretin level can be used as a novel prognostic biomarker for patients with gastric cancer. Patients and methods: Serum levels of transthyretin were examined before treatment in 42 patients with gastric cancer, 30 of whom underwent curative operation and had their prognostic factors analyzed. Results: In an analysis using a receiver operating characteristic curve, transthyretin was evaluated as a useful biomarker to predict the overall survival of the patients (P < 0.033), and a level of 22.8 mg/dL was determined as the cut off value. The transthyretin levels exhibited statistically significant correlations with total protein (r = 0.598, P < 0.001), albumin (r = 0.626, P < 0.001), and retinol binding protein (r = 0.753, P < 0.001). On the other hand, the transthyretin levels showed statistically significant inverse correlations with tumor size (r = -0.753, P < 0.001) and the numbers of involved lymph nodes (r = - 0.453, P < 0.012). The patients with serum transthyretin levels of < 22.8 mg/dL showed poorer prognosis than those with levels of >= 22.8 mg/dL (P = 0.033); therefore, serum transthyretin level was an independent prognostic factor for the gastric cancer patients (hazard ratio: 0.420, 95% confidence interval: 0.180-0.985, P = 0.042). Conclusions: Anthropometric measurement of serum transthyretin can be useful for predicting the prognosis of patients with gastric cancer. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available