4.6 Article

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by large cone resection as fertility-sparing therapy in stage IB cervical cancer

Journal

GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY
Volume 139, Issue 3, Pages 447-451

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.05.043

Keywords

Fertility sparing surgery; Cervical cancer; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; Cone resection

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Standard treatment of cervical cancer FIGO stage IB1 is a radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy. As the number of patients with a preserved fertility wish has increased, the need for fertility sparing surgery emerges. In this study we discuss 11 patients with cervical carcinoma stage IB treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by large cone resection. Methods. In this retrospective study we included 10 patients with FIGO stage IB1 and I patient with IB2 cervical cancer, who first received a pelvic lymphadenectomy followed by neoadjuvant chemotherapy and conization. Paclitaxel-ifosfamide-carboplatin or a combination of paclitaxel-carboplatin was used as neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Results. Complete response after chemotherapy was observed in 64%, partial response in 27% and 9% had progressive disease. All patients with response underwent a conization, with no residual disease on pathology in 80%. Patients with residual disease were treated by radical hysterectomy. In 9 patients fertility sparing surgery could be performed and 6 (67%) got pregnant. Five patients had 7 children and two patients had four missed abortions. Two premature deliveries at 32 and 33 weeks were described, both in the same patient. Recurrence was observed in one patient that was treated with simple hysterectomy followed by radiochemotherapy. Median follow up time is 58 months with all patients alive and no evidence of disease until now. Conclusions. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by conization seems to be a promising new fertility sparing treatment modality in patients with cervical carcinoma stage IB1, but further studies with larger populations should confirm these data. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available