4.6 Article

Modelling injury-burden in rugby sevens

Journal

JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND MEDICINE IN SPORT
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages 553-557

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2017.10.019

Keywords

Kinetic model; Rugby sevens; Risk management; Injury-burden; Match scheduling

Categories

Funding

  1. World Rugby

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: To develop a time-based model of injury-burden for international rugby sevens teams and to demonstrate its utility. Design: Descriptive, cohort study. Methods: Injury data recorded during seven seasons of the Sevens World Series were used to quantify the rate of injury and the rate at which injured players recovered from injury. An equation describing the rate at which injuries were sustained was combined with an equation for the rate at which injured players recovered from injury to produce a time-based equation for the injury-burden of rugby sevens players at any point in time during a season. Results: The overall rates at which match and training injuries were sustained (incidence of injury) were 108.6 (95% confidence interval: 101.6-116.1) injuries/1000 player-match-hours and 0.91 (95% CI: 0.65-1.27) injuries/1000 player-training-hours, respectively. Injured players recovered from injury according to a first-order rate equation with a rate constant of 0.0257 days(-1) calculated from the median severity of injuries sustained (27 days). The time-based injury-burden values predicted from the proposed kinetic model of injury-burden closely matched the values recorded in the Sevens World Series. Conclusions: For governing bodies in rugby, the proposed model provides a way to examine the consequences of changes in the number and timing of international rugby sevens tournaments. For individual teams, the model provides a means to forecast and manage the team's injury-burden as a function of the team's scheduled match and training loads throughout a season. (C) 2017 Sports Medicine Australia. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available