Journal
GYNECOLOGIC AND OBSTETRIC INVESTIGATION
Volume 80, Issue 4, Pages 259-264Publisher
KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000381263
Keywords
Caesarean scar pregnancy; Risk factors; Suction curettage; Haemorrhage; Uterine artery embolization
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Aims: To investigate the potential risk factors for haemorrhage during suction curettage after uterine artery embolization (UAE) in the treatment of caesarean scar pregnancy (CSP). Methods: A case-control study was executed including 35 patients with CSP and haemorrhage during suction curettage after UAE and 140 controls without haemorrhage. The data collected included gestational age, the distance between the gestational mass and the bladder, and the volume of vaginal bleeding. Results: Six patients with UAE needed blood transfusions and two had a hysterectomy, while no patient in the control group needed these interventions. Multivariate analysis showed that both gestational age and the distance between the gestational mass and the bladder were associated with haemorrhage in the CSP group. The odds ratio (OR) of gestational age between cases and controls was 1.579 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.291-1.933), and the OR of the distance between the gestational mass and the bladder was 0.208 (95% CI 0.082-0.531). Conclusion: Increased gestational age might be an important risk factor for haemorrhage during suction curettage after UAE in the treatment of patients with CSP, and a distance of >0.2 cm between the gestational mass and the bladder was protective against haemorrhage. (C) 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available