4.5 Article

Concurrent segregation and erosion effects in medium-energy iron beam patterning of silicon surfaces

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICS-CONDENSED MATTER
Volume 30, Issue 27, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1361-648X/aac79a

Keywords

ion beam sputtering; patterning; silicon; iron silicide; implantation

Funding

  1. MINECO/FEDER (Spain/UE) [MAT2017-85089-C2-1-R, MAT2016-80394-R, FIS2015-66020-C2-1-P, FIS2015-73337-JIN, FIS2016-78883-C2-2-P, BIO2016-79618-R]
  2. Comunidad de Madrid grant NANOAVANSENS [S2013/MIT-3029]
  3. Ramon y Cajal [RYC-2015-18047]
  4. FCT, Portugal

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We have bombarded crystalline silicon targets with a 40 keV Fe+ ion beam at different incidence angles. The resulting surfaces have been characterized by atomic force, current-sensing and magnetic force microscopies, scanning electron microscopy, and x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. We have found that there is a threshold angle smaller than 40 degrees for the formation of ripple patterns, which is definitely lower than those frequently reported for noble gas ion beams. We compare our observations with estimates of the value of the critical angle and of additional basic properties of the patterning process, which are based on a continuum model whose parameters are obtained from binary collision simulations. We have further studied experimentally the ripple structures and measured how the surface slopes change with the ion incidence angle. We explore in particular detail the fluence dependence of the pattern for an incidence angle value (40 degrees) close to the threshold. Initially, rimmed holes appear randomly scattered on the surface, which evolve into large, bug-like structures. Further increasing the ion fluence induces a smooth, rippled background morphology. By means of microscopy techniques, a correlation between the morphology of these structures and their metal content can be unambiguously established.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available